NATO Will Not Take Part in a Syria Strike

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The suspected use of chemical weapons in Syria demands an international response but NATO will not take part, alliance head Anders Fogh Rasmussen told Danish media on Friday.

"I see no NATO role in an international reaction to the (Syrian) regime," Rasmussen told reporters in the Danish town of Vejle, daily Politiken reported.

He said the alleged use of chemical weapons was "a terrifying and horrible act. Chemical attacks are a clear violation of international standards -- a crime that can't be ignored."

"It demands an international response, so it doesn't happen again," Rasmussen said.

The NATO secretary general has in the past insisted on the need for a political solution to the Syrian conflict.

U.N. inspectors have visited the scene of the August 21 suspected gas attack near the Syrian capital.

The opposition says more than 1,300 people died when toxic gases were unleashed on Eastern Ghouta and Moadamiyet al-Sham. Doctors Without Borders said 355 people died of "neurotoxic" symptoms in the affected areas.

Rasmussen said he firmly believed the Syrian regime was behind the attack.

"I have no doubt that the regime carried out a chemical attack," he said, adding: "When you look at who has the chemical stocks and the means to use them in an attack, you have to say that it is the regime."

"There's not much to suggest that the opposition would be in a position to carry out such an attack."

Comments 2
Thumb LebCynic 30 August 2013, 21:19

What a stupid political analogy,,,, because Syria has a chemical weapon stockpile so that makes it evidence beyond doubt that they are responsible for the attack.... I believe there is another analogy,,,, the chemical weapon that killed those people (I won't quote the number as its undoubtedly inflated) was paid for and supplied by the KSA to force the west into action. KSA will be happy to walk away from this bad investment called FSA qeida/nusra however they are too committed. They didn't count on the strength of the Syrian people and the faith they have in their President...

Default-user-icon LEO (Guest) 30 August 2013, 21:36

Wouldn't be much more effective for the FSA to use chemical weapons on the Syrian army and defeat them than using these weapons on citizens? If the opposition has chemical weapons capability why didn't they use it in battles with the army and HA?