Officials Welcome Saudi King’s Call for Dialogue among Lebanese Foes
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةLebanese officials welcomed on Wednesday Saudi King Abdullah’s call for national dialogue among Lebanese foes in an attempt to steer Lebanon clear of regional disputes, local newspapers reported.
Speaker Nabih Berri said that King Abdullah’s letter to President Michel Suleiman is a “direct” and “explicit” call for resumption of dialogue between Lebanese foes amid the critical situation the country is passing through.
“It clearly supports the Lebanese state’s policy to disassociate itself from the developments in Syria,” he told As Safir newspaper.
Abdullah said on Tuesday that the kingdom is monitoring the situation in Lebanon with “deep concern” following the clashes in the northern city of Tripoli, “especially since they targeted a main sect in the country.”
He urged Suleiman in a cable to end the crisis through his call for national dialogue and keenness to keep Lebanon away from regional disputes, most notably the Syrian crisis.
The speaker said that if the President called for the resumption of the all-party talks, then he will be the first to attend.
“My ambition is to launch an open dialogue among all parties in order to preserve Lebanon and avoid the threats,” Berri told An Nahar.
For his part, Prime Minister Najib Miqati said that the Saudi King’s letter confirms that the government’s decision to disassociate itself from the turmoil in the neighboring country Syria was right.
He called on the officials to read well the letter and to stop their “irresponsible” approach.
“Our unity will stop the others from any attempt to target Lebanon,” Miqati told As Safir.
He pointed out that the country is passing through a “difficult time, but if we act responsibly, we will be able to overcome this stage with the slightest losses.”
March 14 coalition sources told An Nahar newspaper that King Abdullah’s letter is a clear Arab warning that the “situation can’t remain the same” under the supervision of the current cabinet.
“A real national dialogue should include all the issues not only Tripoli, as if the problem is limited to a certain area or group,” the sources stated.
Clashes erupted last week in Tripoli between the two rival neighborhoods of Bab al-Tabbaneh and Jabal Mohsen after the General Security Department detained Islamist Shadi al-Mawlawi on charges of belonging to a terrorist group.
On Sunday the clashes spilled to Akkar after Sheikh Ahmed Abdul Wahed was shot dead along with his companion Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Merheb at an army checkpoint in the northern town of al-Kweikhat.
The tension soon spread to Beirut where several areas of the Lebanese capital were blocked by burning tires. Clashes also erupted near the Beirut Arab University in Tariq al-Jedideh between supporters of al-Mustaqbal Movement and Arab Movement party.
well it looks like m8 want to understand what they want from the warning of king Abdullah!
this is not a call to dialogue the way they are portraying it! it is a clear warning not to this cabinet not to venture into acts f violence and assassinations against one particular secte, otherwise face the consequences.
because the syrian regime abducted some shia, we saw what they did yesterday. are these the ones we are asked to sit down with? what is our fault if they have been abducted? why has there been cars smashed just for passing by on the roads?
this is not a call for dialogue, rather it is a warning that such acts should stop immediately.
m8, you will not have a second taef.
As opposed to the peaceful RPG exchange that took place on sunday evening and saturday morning?
As long as people like you are thinking in terms of they vs. we, m8 vs. m14, rather than a united lebanon, outside interference will always stir problems amongst Lebanese. Some members of the lebanese government have clearly understood that (starting with the PM) and are working hard to avoid internal conflict between lebanese... it's time we gave them the backing and support they deserve to achieve their goals... the letter from king Abdullah can only be understood in this context... he did not mean to single out a single sect as you say...