Annan: Syria Agrees to April 10 Deadline for Peace Plan

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

Syria has agreed to "immediately" start pulling troops out of protest cities, U.N.-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan said Monday but Western nations quickly expressed doubts that the new promises would be kept.

Annan said President Bashar al-Assad's foreign minister had agreed to complete a troop and heavy weapon withdrawal by April 10, U.S. ambassador Susan Rice told reporters after a U.N. Security Council meeting on the Syria crisis.

Syria's U.N. envoy, Bashar Jaafari, confirmed the April 10 date had been agreed "by common accord" between Annan and his government.

Annan told the Security Council however that "no progress" has been made yet reaching a ceasefire, diplomats said.

And in announcing the new deadline, the U.S. ambassador said the United States and other countries doubted that Assad would carry out the new commitments.

"Past experience would lead us to be skeptical and to worry that over the next several days, that rather than a diminution of the violence we might yet again see an escalation of the violence. We certainly hope that is not so," Rice said.

Annan briefed a closed meeting of the 15-member council by videoconference from Geneva on his efforts to halt the Assad government assault against protesters and opposition groups. The U.N. says more than 9,000 have died in the violence of the past year.

The Syrian foreign minister, Walid Muallem, had written to Annan on Sunday agreeing to the new deadline, Rice told reporters.

Muallem "said the Syrian military will begin immediately and by April 10 will complete the cessation of all forward deployment and use of heavy weapons and will complete its withdrawal from population centers," Rice said.

She added that Annan's deputy Nasser al-Qudwa is in contact with Syrian opposition groups to get them to halt hostilities within 48 hours of government forces carrying out their commitments.

Annan had wanted an earlier deadline, Rice added, "But he urged the government of Syria to start immediately and to ensure that forces move no further into population centers, and as he related that commitment was provided by the Syrian authorities."

Annan also called on the council to support the April 10 deadline and to start considering the deployment of a U.N.-backed observer mission in Syria if fighting is halted. Members of Annan's team are to go to Damascus this week to discuss a possible observer mission.

Sending a U.N. mission would require a Security Council resolution however and a new diplomatic standoff is likely over any attempt to impose a deal on Assad which could hold up council backing.

Arab, Western and other nations at a Friends of Syria meeting on Sunday called for a deadline to be set, but Russia, Syria's main ally and a permanent member of the Security Council, has rejected the calls.

"Ultimatums and artificial deadlines rarely help matters," Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Monday.

Lavrov said the peace plan would not work unless rebel forces also agreed to halt hostilities.

Russia and China have already blocked two resolutions on Syria, using their powers as permanent members of the Security Council.

Annan went to Damascus this month to meet Assad for talks and has since regularly pressed the Syrian government to start moves to halt the violence.

The Syrian president has accepted Annan's plan but so far made no move to carry it out. Assad's government has insisted there has to be peaceful conditions before it can halt its operations in protest cities.

The Syrian ambassador said there were no preconditions for the April 10 accord with Annan. But he added: "We are expecting Mr. Annan and some parties in the Security Council to get the same kind of commitments" from the opposition.

Jaafari also lambasted Gulf nations and Turkey for holding Sunday's meeting on Syria and offering to pay the salaries of Syrian opposition groups. He said it was "a declaration of war."

Comments 7
Default-user-icon Hitech (Guest) 02 April 2012, 19:24

When Saddam Hussein told Hafez el Assad: "I know why you don't get out of Lebanon. If you get out of Lebanon, you get out of Damascus". That's simply stating the obvious. Such regimes can stay in power through their foreign reach. The big question for the region is not Syria, no one is expecting Assad to stay in power for 10 more years, to put as the Russian ambassador did. The big question is Iran. It is just a matter of time before Assad falls; that's an inalienable truth. April 10th is just another date in the decline of the Assad rule. However if Iran looses its influence in Syria, that will be the beginning of the end of the Islamist state too. The winds of change are blowing from Cairo to Tehran, thanks to America's most efficient tool for freedom and new ideals, and the best weapon against Islamists and extremists: Facebook.

Thumb bigsami 02 April 2012, 19:30

The only way for lasting peace in Syria is for Assad to hit the road. If Russia and China love him so much why have neither yet offered him asylum? Because no one likes bringing garbage to their homes....

Thumb beiruti 02 April 2012, 19:41

That's funny! The only thing that will start the "peace plan" is to make the SNC's recognition as the "sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people" mean something by invoking Chapter VII, Article 51 of the UN Charter so that it may evict the illigitimate Assad Regime from the offices of power, by force, under the doctrine of self defense.

Thumb lebnanfirst 02 April 2012, 20:15

The longest journey starts with the first step. Sure, it took some time to make this step but now that it is made it will be up to the Syrian people to demonstrate when their demonstrations are safe to unequivocally show the world they will not settle for Assad rule.

Default-user-icon Gabby (Guest) 02 April 2012, 20:37

People Power has it exactly correct. Plus if there is a cease fire the country will erupt in peaceful demonstrations agains Bashar. He is doomed.

My question is why they also didn't charge him with war crimes?

Default-user-icon Trueself (Guest) 02 April 2012, 20:59

This is yet another ploy from the assad regime to stifle the progress of the opposition parties in Syria. We experienced this numerous times in Lebanon from the regime of Syria; they are experts in manipulation and gaining time. But I am not sure this will work in Syria. The Syrian people have thus far shed more than 10,000 lives and Gid knows how many were exterminated without anybody's knowledge, let alone the hundreds of thousands who became handicaped over the last year of strife and war. If the peace plan of Anan is just to stop hostilities, the game is not yet over. of Syria. Only by toppling the regime would Syria go back to normal, and we in Lebanon could from here on live in peace away from the shackles of the evil regime in Syria. I am more than certain that Syria and Lebanon could help each other to become a peaceful democratic countries free from the evil of the Assad family.

Default-user-icon Enough (Guest) 03 April 2012, 04:44

This is all a bad joke... How many ultimatums will the Assad government be given? The Assad's will never willingly give up power.

I hope the Syrian people will remember forget the role that Russia has played in keeping the Tyrant in control.