Obama Says U.S. Ready to Strike Syria, Will Seek Congress Authorization

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

U.S. President Barack Obama announced Saturday that the United States is ready to strike Syria "whenever it chooses," adding also that he will ask the Congress to authorize the military action, lifting the threat of immediate strikes on President Bashar Assad's regime.

Obama said he had decided a chemical weapons attack on a Syrian suburb that killed more than 1,400 people was so heinous that he would respond with a limited U.S. military strike.

But, in a move which could reshape the balance of power between Capitol Hill and the presidency, he said he believed it was important to secure support from Congress to wage war.

The decision represents a leap of faith for a president who has an estranged relationship with Republicans in the divided Congress and he risks suffering the same fate as British Prime Minister David Cameron, who lost his own vote on authorizing military action in parliament.

"I will seek authorization for the use of force from the American people's representatives in Congress," Obama said.

Obama will be relatively confident of winning a vote in the Senate, which is controlled by Democrats and includes a number of Republicans, like Senator John McCain, who have argued for military action against Syria.

But it would be hazardous to predict how the vote will go in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives, which contains conservatives who revile the president and have obstructed his agenda across the board.

House Speaker John Boehner said that the chamber would debate Syria as soon as it comes back into session on September 9, meaning that lawmakers will not be called back early from their summer break.

There had been growing expectations in Washington that military action could even happen as soon as this weekend, but Obama's decision means that will now not happen.

Nevertheless, the president also said that he had decided that the use of force should be the price for what the United States says is the "undeniable" use of chemical weapons by Syria.

"Our military has positioned assets in the region," Obama said.

"We are prepared to strike whenever we choose."

The U.S. Constitution states that Congress and not the president has the power to declare war.

But in practice, presidents have argued that limited engagements that stop short of full warfare -- as Obama envisages will take place in Syria -- do not require a full authorization.

In asking Congress to weigh in, Obama was sticking to his principles as laid out in his 2008 election campaign, when he argued that the president does not have the power to carry out military action abroad without the consent of Congress.

He may also have had one eye on public opinion, which he admits is war weary amid signs that Americans do not want to enter another Middle Eastern war.

An NBC News poll published on Friday found that half of Americans did not wish to intervene militarily in Syria, where more than 100,000 people have died in a bitter civil war.

Eight in ten of those asked said that the president should get authorization from Congress before launching military action.

Though his decision Saturday will be seen by critics as a climbdown, Obama was adamant that military action was the answer to the chemical attack last week which Washington says killed more than 1,400 people.

"This attack is an assault on human dignity. It also presents a serious danger to our national security. It risks making a mockery of the global prohibition on the use of chemical weapons," Obama said in the White House Rose Garden.

"It endangers our friends and our partners along Syria's borders, including Israel, Jordan, Turkey, Lebanon and Iraq.

"It could lead to escalating use of chemical weapons, or their proliferation to terrorist groups who would do our people harm."

Comments 18
Default-user-icon LEO (Guest) 31 August 2013, 21:47

For Obama, it doesn't matter how this ends up. Because it will not end well and he knows he has painted himself in a corner. He is now looking for someone or something to blame when this crisis ends badly. That's how he rolls ever since he became president. Obama is a lightweight politician that tells people what they want to hear. The American people are finally fed up with this lier.

Thumb bustany 31 August 2013, 21:52

This is a major victory for the Israelis. Very good Obama. You stick to the people who support you, finance you and order you

Thumb scorpyonn 01 September 2013, 07:16

I think the Syrians are a worse enemy anyway.

Default-user-icon Abdul (Guest) 31 August 2013, 21:53

if this had to be approved by the congress, then this mark the end of U.S being the world super power, because definitely without thought the western will be on shame.

Thumb _-_wolf_-_ 31 August 2013, 22:37

If the US congress has any common sense at all then they shall vote against any proposed attack on Syria . Remember General Collin Powell's convincing argument at the UN about Iraq having WMD back in 2003 ? What utter BS that was ! To the American people , wise up this is an Israeli agenda using your hardware - again , if you want to stop an influx of US soldiers arriving in body bags back home then you must not agree to an attack on Syria , it would have dire consequences throughout the region & the world ie WW3 ! Phol pot killed over a million , Rwanda over a million also were killed where were the mighty US then? Every theatre of war that the US has created were falsified & itself ( US) at the end failed . Vote No for a Military intervention ..!
Signed Wolf !!

Thumb _-_wolf_-_ 31 August 2013, 23:47

Once your drugs have worn off then re-read my post in the morning , even your post is incoherent m11er.....
Signed Wolf !

Thumb bustany 31 August 2013, 23:54

You right M11er, your feeling toward Shiaa is shared by Obama. You are reading history very well. Saudi and Sunni Arabs financed Saddam Hussien for 11 years against Iran. Billion they will spend to Obama now

Missing coolmec 31 August 2013, 22:38

Right on m11er I second that

Thumb scorpyonn 01 September 2013, 07:59

And I quadruple that

Missing coolmec 31 August 2013, 22:39

hey bigjohn
I am Lebanese American and very proud of that I repeat long Live the USA

Thumb scorpyonn 01 September 2013, 08:01

You bet, Coolmec!

Thumb bustany 31 August 2013, 23:52

Sorry my friend! but the hate M14 and alike have for Shiaa is beyond realizing USA intentions or Israel one. The hate is so huge it blinds. Obama is a Sunni and he will do anything to defeat Iran and Syrian regime

Default-user-icon Strawberry (Guest) 01 September 2013, 00:53

Obama is sunni? How so? Dont tell me its because he is allied with the arab kings and princes? Those fake kings are not sunnis. They are non-Muslim according to sunni Islam. If he really wanted to defeat the syrian regime, he would have done so. All the US care about is the safety of israel. The US does not care about Muslims, christians, druze or anyone but israel and that is why they are allied with the arab heretic kings and princes who protect israel and keep the arabs from harming israel. All arab leaders are traitors and that includes bashar and his late father, they all just have diffirent ways of being traitors. Oh and if McCain had been the president of the US, the war on syria would have happened a long time ago so dont play the obama is sunni card mimicking the rebublican accusation against him being muslim. That is pretty common these days among your type, to use the language of bush and the republicans.

Default-user-icon Bustanyfiddler (Guest) 01 September 2013, 03:11

" Obama is a Sunni" You must be real delusional to think that son. Go read some books..

Thumb scorpyonn 01 September 2013, 09:19

You are so primitive and it is your type of feeble Iranian type of mentality that keeps sectarian divisions alive. I bet you support women who wear headscarves too!

Thumb _-_wolf_-_ 01 September 2013, 00:01

The problem is yet to be proven , ie , not if CW were used but who used them & how !
Not one of spec of proof or 100% evidence by the West has shown us beyond any reasonable doubt that the Syrian Government used them ! If this was a Civil Court matter in any western country it would have been thrown out by now due to lack of evidence....accusations only does not justify Capital Punishment ..period !
Signed Wolf .

Thumb _-_wolf_-_ 01 September 2013, 03:36

Agreed eagle_eye why Israel is not on the list becaues it controls the US Senate, Congress , & even the US President !
Signed Wolf .

Thumb Machia 01 September 2013, 06:47

Supporters of the butcher of Damascus should not worry. The West and Israel are his number 1 supporters. Both him and his murderous father have served the interests of Israel very well. They forgot about the Golan, neutralized the Palestinian fighters in Syria and Lebanon, broke the positive effects of the first Palestinian intifada, blew away the peace process by encouraging and financing suicide bombers and brought back the Likud to power in Israel.
They will stay in place as long as they play by those rules. They killed tens of thousands of Syrians but did not play fair. Now Obama threatened to strike to show solidarity with the oil Sheikhdoms where the US interests truly lie but now he can tell them:"I tried hard but the congress didn't let me..."