Jumblat Says Unconditional Dialogue is Absolute Necessity
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية
Progressive Socialist Party chief Walid Jumblat said Saturday that dialogue was an absolute necessity after President Michel Suleiman failed once again to bring the rival March 8 and 14 camps together.
“Dialogue comes first and is required at this dangerous stage,” he said in remarks to As Safir daily, stressing that his calls for continued cooperation among Lebanon's bickering camps haven't changed.
“Maybe others have changed but they should know that there is no way out of sitting together at the dialogue table,” the PSP chief told the newspaper about the March 14 opposition alliance.
Jumblat rejected preconditions and said the Lebanese should not wait for the developments in Syria to settle scores in Lebanon.
In a direct criticism of the opposition al-Mustaqbal movement, the Druze leader expressed his surprise at its willingness to take part in the meetings of a parliamentary electoral subcommittee while rejecting to attend the all-party talks at Baabda palace.
The March 14 alliance announced its boycott of the national dialogue and government-related activity in the aftermath of the Oct. 19 assassination of Internal Security Forces Intelligence Bureau chief Wissam al-Hasan.
It said it will end its boycott only after the formation of a new government. It also set a new condition last month, saying it would attend the national dialogue if Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah declared that he was ready to discuss placing the party’s arsenal under the authority of the Lebanese state.
Although the opposition was adamant not to deal with the government, it announced its willingness to take part in the meetings of the parliamentary subcommittee set to discuss electoral districts and the type of system in the elections.
Jumblat reiterated that “it was wrong to remain in a wait-and-see situation because Syria is heading towards an abyss. So it is illogical to boycott constitutional institutions.”
05 January 2013, 08:50
13
Walid Beik
we know the threats of hizbushaitan make this period a dangerous one.
but does it justify sitting down with those threatening us to take their orders? I think NOT.
until hizbushaitan shows they are committed to Lebanon only, and decide to revert on their decisions to govern the country on their own, there is no room for discussions.
yesterday we heard 2 comments from their 2 top most leaders stating no one group can govern alone: isn't that what they did and still doing?
you fool me once.....
05 January 2013, 20:05
02
Everyone is aware of how Jumblat was cornered by HA and that he is interested in saving his skin and that of his sect. This is after all Lebanon.
M14 are no angels either but they do espouse the philosophy that most Lebanese support. They have paid in blood for their stances and beliefs and have reached the conclusion that the other side does not understand the meaning of win-win negotiations not win-loose which is so typical of our Eastern culture.
With their life's constantly under death threats, they decided enough is enough and they are finally doing what their supporters wanted them to do long ago - show some backbone and stop conceding with no reciprocation from the per side.
Enough is enough.
