Govt. Approves Diplomatic Appointments, Suleiman Says Door of Dialogue with March 14 Still Open
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةThe government on Wednesday approved the long-awaited diplomatic appointments, selecting ambassadors comprised of state employees and non-state employees, in the first cabinet session to be held after the assassination of Intelligence Bureau head Maj. Gen. Wissam al-Hasan and amid calls for the cabinet to step down.
MTV, meanwhile, reported that "the ministers of the National Struggle Front voiced reservations over the government's appointment of non-state employees as ambassadors."
During the session, President Michel Suleiman said “the country is going through a difficult period and the situations around us are not easy, that's why dialogue must be the only path towards resolving the crisis.”
At the beginning of the session, the president called on the army to control the security situations as soon as possible, saying the chiefs of the security agencies briefed him on Tuesday on “the preemptive plan that is being implemented to prevent any security incidents or bombings.”
Suleiman noted that “there is international keenness on security and political stability in Lebanon, and this was demonstrated in the meetings, statements and contacts of the past few days.”
“If it is possible to form a national unity government in order to reach a better situation, we are not against this idea and the door is open for everyone,” Suleiman added, revealing that his latest talks with several political leaders did not tackle the formation of a new government.
“We did not violate the Constitution by holding these consultations and we did not close the door on any proposal,” the president said.
Commenting on the statement issued by the March 14 forces on Tuesday, Suleiman pointed out that “March 14's stances did not close the door on the possibility of engaging in dialogue, and this is something positive.”
Following a broad meeting at the Center House on Tuesday, the March 14 forces declared a “total boycott” of Prime Minister Najib Miqati's government, calling for a “neutral, salvation government that endorses the Baabda Declaration as its ministerial Policy Statement.”
“We will not tolerate that our rejection of the dangerous situation be depicted as a battle to return to power or to the premiership,” the March camp said.
Hasan was assassinated in a massive car bombing in Ashrafiyeh on October 19. Two other people were killed and more than 100 wounded, as the blast gutted two apartment buildings.
The opposition March 14 forces have blamed Syria for the attack and demanded the resignation of the Hizbullah-led government.
Dont you think we should keep the weapons until our army is strong enough to replace HA? Dont you think we could use HA as a reason why other countries should help build our true national army? What is the point of weakening our defences before they are built? Arent you scared of a defense vacuum?
No insults...keep it civilized as it has been. But, dont you think you are missing the point? You said "since 2000". It's not like Israel left out of the kindness of its heart; it left because it was hurting too much inside Lebanon. Hezbollah was the reason why they left; therefore, wouldnt it be right to assume that if Hezbollah disarms, they would come right back? Now let's look at the second point of your argument: you said the army should take over the weapons. I dont disagree, but it wouldnt solve the problem against Israel. You're assuming that Israel's problem lies in the fact that HA is Shia/Muslim. No matter what the ethnicity, religion of the party that has the weapons (be it the army or the christians), Israel would place Lebanon in the same situation it is today.
Isnt it the right of any nation to be able to defend itself, Israel aside? Arm the army before disarming the resistance, not after.
And, they have continuously invaded syria, whether it be through isolation, direct military adventures (the bombing of a facility in 08), or taking advantage of what is happening today. There are US soldiers stationed in Jordan, ready to make sure the will of the ppl of Jordan does not divert too far away from where it's been since 94. And Egypt...are you forgetting that for 30 years they werent able to freely move their own army? Their army took direct orders from Israel. Whether its insignificant is besides the point.
Israel wouldnt be happy just because our arms in the possession of the army. Are you forgetting the wars of the past that it initiated against national armies or even the one that it threatens today (Iran)? It is not a coincidence that the only armies it leaves alone are those that allow the US to build bases on and occupy.
Finally, the black shirt incident is a game being played internally with those up above (the same kind of game that is played when M14 secretly funds and supports the likes of Assir). Its not excusable, but think about the incident. It is all in the context of the arms: it came during a period when the STL was as its "threatening-peak". I think we can all agree at this point that the STL is a tool to weaken the resistance and does nothing for justice. One side in Lebanon utilizes the ability to issue baseless indictments approved by the enemies of Lebanon while one side responds. Its inexcusable but for a portion of the Lebanese that are still affected by the Israeli occupation (be it physical or overflights or whatever), they arent willing to let the resistance fall just yet. Not until there is an army that can defend us or until there is no longer an entity by the name of Israel.
my point was leave the politics aside for now. Our disagreement lies only in the timing of the disarming of the resistance. We both agree it should happen and we both agree M8 and M14 play dirty politics.
Who knows if it was Israel or Syria, it doesnt matter. I dont personally believe it was HA but this is not a point im willing to argue because neither of us have the evidence to prove for or against.
How does it change for you personally if Hezbollah's name was changed to "Lebanese Army"?
2nd question: Do you think Israel would leave us alone if we simply changed the name?
Its a messed up situation ya arzakyalibnan. I dont try to offend anyone so if I have then disregard my comments as I dont like to get into online quibbles