Berri Calls for International Agreement Banning Attack on Religious Symbols
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةSpeaker Nabih Berri reiterated his support on Thursday to the electoral draft law approved by the cabinet, calling for popular protests in the United States and across the world to push towards an agreement that bans any attack on religious symbols.
“Lebanon's salvation is based on the electoral reform that includes the right representations and eases the sectarian tension,” Berri said in remarks published in As Safir newspaper.
The government approved in August a new electoral law based on proportional representation and 13 districts.
On Wednesday, the joint parliamentary committees suspended its session over a lack of quorum when opposition MPs withdrew from the meeting during discussions on the matter.
Concerning the anti-Islam film which sparked furious protests outside U.S. embassies in at least 20 countries, Berri criticized the U.S. Administration for not dealing with the matter in a “different way.”
The U.S. “should have taken swift measures to contain the rage to preserve its interests in the first degree,” the speaker noted.
He called for an organized and meaningful action, inside and outside the U.S., to push towards an international resolution that prevents attacking religions.
The crude low-budget production mocks Islam and portrays the Prophet Mohammed as immoral and violent, while touching on themes of homosexuality and pedophilia.
Asked about the protests that Hizbullah chief Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah called for across Lebanon following the spread of the anti-Islam film on Internet, Berri described the rally in Beirut's southern suburbs on Monday as “civilized.”
“It should be an example as no security incidents were reported although protesters passed by several American restaurants,” Berri said.
He expressed disappointment at the Arab officials' failure to take any action regarding the “insulting” film, hailing Foreign Minister Adnan Mansour's initiative.
The FM announced on Sunday his will to call for an urgent meeting of Arab foreign ministers to denounce the film.
“He only discussed the possibility of such a meeting and didn't take a decision,” Berri said, denying that President Michel Suleiman lashed out at the FM for his initiative during a cabinet session at the Baabda Palace on Monday.
“Suleiman only demanded some clarifications, voicing his support to his initiative,” he added.
Berri... One of Lebanon's biggest criminal and thief is now the voice of wisedom...lol...
or ignore that movie all together... it will die a natural death.. all this hoopla have made a start out of its producer!!
Seriously, where do you draw the line? Family Guy regularly mocks religious figures and the Taliban destroyed Buddhist temples when they were in power so everyone does it.
Just let this 11 minute movie die and stop talking about it.
Instead of banning attacks on religious symbols, why not an international agreement banning religion altogether? Now that would take care of all our problems!
Maybe instead of International Agreement Banning Attacks on Religious Symbols, we should should just ban religion altogether.
Now that would take care of all our problems!
(corrects last post)
Sure, the world would be very preocuppied creating such international legislative text... in the middle ages!!!
Now that it touched the Muslims it is a big deal. Look at the churches they burn in Egypt, Nigeria, etc. Why doesn't Turkey open Agia Sophia as a church again and allow priests to train at Halki? Look at the churches that have been stripped in Northern Cyprus for decades. The Hezz are building on Church land in Lebanon.
What a bunch of hipocrites over a bad movie when real things are being don in the country and the region and they say nothing.
Berry? Seriously? How about a rule to stop barbaric reactions to things happening outside our borders?
@ Mr. Berri, how about a law that forbids you from remaining in your current political post for as many years as you have, you corrupt thug you!
Berri doesnt say how his law would work.
1. who decides what is offensive?
2. what is the ounishment for a violation?
3. How do you prevent the abuses seen in Pakistan and elsewhere?