Iran to Continue Uranium Enrichment
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةIran "will never stop" its controversial uranium enrichment, the country's envoy to the IAEA said on Tuesday, on the sidelines of a Non-Aligned Movement ministerial meeting in Tehran.
"Our enrichment activities will never stop and we are justified in carrying them out, and we will continue to do so under IAEA supervision," Ali Asghar Soltanieh told reporters.
"We will not give up our inalienable right to enrichment," he said.
The defiant reaffirmation of Iran's position underscored a showdown between the Islamic republic and the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency, and the U.N. Security Council.
The Security Council has repeatedly demanded Iran cease its uranium enrichment and has imposed four sets of sanctions on the country, which have been greatly reinforced by separate U.S. and EU sanctions.
The five permanent members of the Security Council, plus Germany, also this year engaged in three rounds of face-to-face negotiations with Iran on the issue, but they ended in an impasse, with contact downgraded to telephone calls between Iranian and EU officials.
Iran's enrichment is to again be raised this week, when the IAEA is expected to release its latest report based on its ongoing inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities.
Some of the report's findings have already been leaked to Israeli and U.S. media, mainly those confirming a July 25 statement by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that hundreds more uranium enrichment centrifuges had been installed.
Iran's refusal to allow inspectors into a military base outside Tehran, Parchin, could also form part of the report.
Western diplomats last week told Agence France Presse that months of clean-up work detected at Parchin suggested the site had been "sanitized" to such an extent that a nuclear inspection would now be pointless.
Soltanieh responded by saying that Parchin "has been blown out of proportion" and said claims of nuclear warhead design tests there were "fabricated by foreign intelligence."
He said Iran was demanding to see the documents the IAEA was using to pursue its suspicions about Parchin and urged the agency to "close this chapter."
He also said Iran has complained to the IAEA about the leaks.
On Iran's intent to continue enriching uranium, Soltanieh noted that the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the IAEA's statutes made no explicit mention of levels of enrichment.
"The level of enrichment and how much to enrich has not been fixed in either of those. There is no limitation," he said.
"Everything we do is under the supervision of the agency," he stressed.
The United States and its Western allies, and Israel, suspect that Iran is intent on developing nuclear weapons "break-out" capability.
Iran denies that, saying its nuclear program is purely for civilian use.
The problem is a deficit of trust. Iranians do not trust the US and UN and the US and UN have no confidence in the Iranian leadership. As long as this condition persists, the drift toward war is inevitable. The principal stoker of distrust between the parties is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with a strong assist from Benjamin Netanyahu.
When did Netanyahu ever threat to destroy Iran - Never
When did Ahmadinejad threaten to destroy Israel - Today, Yesterday, The day before, last week, last month, last years, always.
So who is to be scared of more.
Lebanons' Government should remember that an Iranian atomic attack on Israel will bring nuclear fallout over their country.
A missile fired from Iran towards Israel has to pass over Iraq/ Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Palestinian territories. What would happen to these countries if even only one missile was intercepted and exploded over their territory. SCARY!!
Assume that an Iranian nuclear missile hit Central Israel (Between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem), how many Israeli and Palestinian Moslem and Christian civilians would be killed or wounded ?
How many Moslem holy sites would be destroyed, including the Mosques
of Omar (The third most holy site in Islam) and al Aksa?
Can Islam and Christianity keep silent over these Iranian threats? I hope not
Very good & valid points Phillipo. In utmost reality, I don't think either side will use them. BUT to have them serves as a reassurance that no one will mess with them. It's like an insurance policy which ultimately gives you respect through fear of power to do mass destruction.
I agree with you.
According to all reports Israel has nuclear weapons, so why didn't it use them in the wars it has fought.
For the simple reason that is if does have them it is as a deterrent, not as a threat to annihilate another state.
Most of your points I agree with but.......
1. South Africa never had the nuclear bomb.
2. Jews had live in the Holy Land for 2000 years before Jesus proclaimed Christianity, and 2,500 years before Mohammed proclaimed Islam.
3. How could the Zionists have wiped Palestine off the map, if a Palestinian state had never existed? Why didn't Egypt and Jordan establish an independent Palestinian state whilst they occupied it between 1948 and 1967?