U.S., EU Sanction Russians, Ukrainians after Crimea Vote

إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربية W460

The United States on Monday imposed financial sanctions on seven top Russian government officials and lawmakers to punish Russia's incursion into Crimea.

In a new executive order, President Barack Obama also imposed sanctions against former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and one of his top advisors and two top "separatist" leaders in Crimea.

The moves cemented the deepest confrontation between Washington and the Kremlin since the Cold War, and came as Crimea took several steps towards joining Russia a day after voting to do so in a referendum the West has called illegitimate.

Senior U.S. officials said the sanctions were designed to punish "cronies" of Russian President Vladimir Putin's government who were intimately involved in the move into Crimea.

The list of officials who will see any property, assets and interests blocked in the United States includes Dmitry Rogozin, deputy prime minister, and several senior members of the Duma and advisors to President Vladimir Putin.

They also included Vladislav Surkov and Sergei Glazyev, key aides to Putin and Duma members Leonid Slutsky, Yelena Mizulina.

Federation Council members Andrei Klishas and Valentina Matviyenko are also targeted.

The officials targeted in Crimea include Sergei Aksyonov, who has named himself the interim prime minister of the territory and Vladimir Konstantinov, the speaker of the Crimean parliament.

Any assets of Yanukovych and Viktor Medvedchuk, leader of the pro-Russia "Ukrainian Choice" faction, in the United States will also be seized, the White House said.

Earlier, European Union foreign ministers agreed sanctions against 21 Russian and Ukrainian officials deemed responsible for a contested secession referendum in Crimea, officials said.

Lithuania's Foreign Minister Linas Linkevicius told AFP that the 21 would be targeted by travel bans and asset freezes.

"These are persons from so-called Crimea leadership and Russian representatives, specifically from Duma and representatives of military forces, that took part in these illegal actions," he told AFP.

The minister said in a tweet that there would be "more EU measures in few days."

Leaders of the 28-nation bloc are to hold summit talks in Brussels on Thursday and Friday, with the crisis in Ukraine expected to top the agenda.

The list of those sanctioned by the ministers will be released in the EU's daily Official Journal but diplomats said 13 were from Russia and 8 from Ukraine's Crimea region.

They were targeted "for undermining the sovereignty of Ukraine."

The ministers met after a referendum Sunday showed an overwhelming majority in Crimea in favor of joining Russia, a vote the EU condemned as illegal and in violation of Moscow's own international commitments to preserve the territorial integrity of Ukraine.

Canada also slapped sanctions later on Monday on seven Russian and three Crimean senior officials it said "bear political responsibility for the crisis" in the former Soviet satellite.

Those targeted by sanctions announced by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper include an adviser and an aide to Putin, as well as Russian Deputy PM Rogozin.

Crimea's Prime Minister Serhiy Aksyonov and chairman of Crimea's parliament, Viktor Medvedchuk, were also named.

Harper is scheduled to travel to Ukraine on Saturday to meet with Ukrainian interim prime minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk.

He will be the first G7 leader to visit the country since tensions broke out between Ukraine and Russia over the Crimean peninsula.

Canada has 1.2 million citizens who trace their ancestry to Ukraine.

Meanwhile, Russian lawmakers named by the White House as falling under sanctions reacted defiantly.

"There hasn't been anything like this even in the Cold War years," said Valentina Matviyenko, the speaker of the upper house of parliament, the Federation Council, quoted by Interfax news agency.

"This is political blackmail," said Matviyenko, a former deputy prime minister, denying she had any assets, accounts or property abroad.

"No one will manage to scare us with threats," she said.

Lawmaker Yelena Mizulina, the author of a controversial law banning gay "propaganda" to minors, also denied she had any assets or property abroad.

"I personally think they are stooping to a very low, banal level. For a strong country, that's not dignified," she told a briefing, quoted by Interfax.

Putin's aide Vladislav Surkov, known as a shadowy eminence grise of the Kremlin, called the sanctions "a great honor for me" in comments to Moskovsky Komsomolets daily.

Surkov, who has composed rock lyrics as a hobby and is rumored to have written a novel under a pseudonym, vowed the measures would not stop him enjoying U.S. culture, including the music of late rapper Tupac Shakur.

"The U.S. I am interested in Tupac Shakur, Allen Ginsberg and Jackson Pollock. I don't need a visa to access their work. So I lose nothing," he added, referring also to the Beat poet and drip painter.

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin reacted with irony on Twitter, writing in Russian: "Worldwide recognition at last!"

"I think some prankster prepared the draft of this Act of the U.S. President," he added in English.

Federation Council members Andrei Klishas told Interfax he saw "no tragedy" in the sanctions, adding that: "The group of people that I find myself in suits me just fine."

The head of the State Duma's committee for relations with ex-Soviet states, Leonid Slutsky, told Interfax: "I have no accounts or property in the USA. As for private visits, I'll have to get by without them."

Deputy foreign minister Sergei Ryabkov told journalists he was "outraged by the decision of the U.S. administration to introduce sanctions," cited by the ITAR-TASS news agency.

He slammed the U.S. for its "one-sided and unbalanced approach absolutely ignoring reality."

Comments 11
Missing nuetral 17 March 2014, 16:25

There they go stealing peoples money again.

Default-user-icon Mitch (Guest) 17 March 2014, 16:37

Oh and we won't worry about sanctioning Putin. What a farce. We shoud all sanction the US for it's bombing of Serbia. We should sanction them for bombing and INVADING Iraq and Afghanistan of which neither harmed the world or other nations as Al-Qadia was built by the Yankees themselves directly from Virginia.

Thumb ado.australia 17 March 2014, 17:06

pheonix... its not as if the US can do anything. They must make an attempt at punishing "pro russian" officials with sanctions that probably wont affect them one bit. Crimea and the Ukraine is Russian territory and area of influence. Its a red line for russia. Not a pretend red line for the media... but a real life, threat to the sovereignty of Russia red line! no one can do anything about it and the world knows it just like what happened in Georgia.

Yanukovych might have been a despot leader but the way the EU, US and NATO cheered and rushed to acknowledge a government that expelled 70% of the Ukrainian elected politicians and undermined and threatened russian speakers and the Russian military by neo nazis, is the reason the bear lost patience with the threats and attacks on its border. Do you know what the Ukraine translates as? "The border lands"! The Ukraine are the Russian border lands!

stop poking the bear and the bear will not have a tantrum.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 17 March 2014, 20:33

Ado. It is true the USA cannot do anything directly but my money will be on the membership of both Ukraine and Georgia into NATO. Something the Russians have been dreading. This also the end of the economic union Putin was craving for as there is high distrust of Russia after this move in many ex soviet countries especially since they hold "Russian people" of their own.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 18 March 2014, 09:34

senesence.. i agree with alot you had to say... it is pretty obvious that US red lines are made with a tube of tipex in the hand... they have shown nothing but weakness with Obama. But i think Putin has bitten off more than he can chew. we will see i guess.

Thumb michael715 17 March 2014, 20:27

US in league with House of Saud and now with Nazis. Sadness. American Foreign Policy consists of Bluffing, Bombs, and Bad Choices

Thumb Senescence 17 March 2014, 20:49

anonymetexasusa, things are not as simple as you would like to make them be. When dealing with statistics and demographics, and specially populations, you should have a firm understanding of all 3 of them to make a credible interpretation, and I sense you do not since you're analysis is overly simplistic in all regards.

Thumb Senescence 17 March 2014, 20:50

2. The point you should take home is that even so-called Ukrainians in Crimea do not see themselves as such, and the strong Russian sphere of influence encompasses Ukraine to such an extent that almost the entire populational representation characterized itself as more Russian than Ukrainian when provided a choice of either/or. I'd like to make a brief mention of my time in Ukraine where a lot of the times I'd hear people reminiscing about 'the good ol' soviet days' and going on about 'if this were Russia' and so on. It's all about the maturity and understanding that being part of the Russia Federation is magnitudes better than the current situation in Ukraine, and the country being under the Russian sphere of influence for at about a century and sharing a common history hat eclipses this figure by quite a margin tends to shape the values and beliefs held by the population, and that includes the predilection of wanting to go back to Russia.

Thumb Senescence 17 March 2014, 20:50

3. I understand your (maybe perceived) frustration regarding the matter, but you must observe things with reasonable objectivity. Would it have made a difference if it was 60% or 70% or even 51%? Democracy rules, no double standards please; your presidents are chosen to lead the most powerful country on the planet by a difference of even 1%. Regardless of all this, I believe the reasons for opposing the Crimean referendum involves a couple of things worth mentioning:

First, Russia's the new kid on the block that needs some roughening up in order to subjugate itself to the current hierarchy of power (e.g. USA#1!! durr).

Second, this would set a bad precedent for the exact countries who are most vehemently against the referendum. You have Texas that wants to secede from the US, Quebec from Canada, Scotland from Britain, Brittany from France, even Tibet from China, and so on.

Thumb Senescence 17 March 2014, 20:51

4. Third, it undoubtedly undermines US power, which is a good thing. I'm no US hater, in fact I know for a fact that most technological advances were conceived of in the US, but taking things down a notch politically wouldn't be a bad idea given the fact that the US has singularly destabilized the entirety of the Middle East and at least half of Latin America, and has always tried to enforce the 'right' choices in regards to democratic decisions and fruition thereof (e.g. CIA backed contras/revolutions/counter-revolutions/etc.) . Russia's not much better than the US in many cases, but having a unipolar world is not healthy nor productive for the world nor the future of mankind. I welcome this step as a correction of error.

Thumb arzak-ya-libnan 18 March 2014, 08:08

texas, i already mentioned in a past post that the succession of crimea is a "good" thing for the pro-west Ukrainians. and that the pro-russians lost a good chunk of the votes. I do not believe any other area will secede as the heat is already too high with crimea alone.
Ukraine will join NATO, and so will Georgia... this will be the biggest "punishment" (even though russia actually did the west a favor in Ukrain) of Russia the west can hand out.
The economic union that Putin dreams of is also finished. there is too much distrust and fear in the ex-soviet states that have a substantial russian speaking population. many of the stans are already condemning russias actions.