Russia Vetoes, China Abstains on U.N. Resolution on Crimea
إقرأ هذا الخبر بالعربيةRussia vetoed a Western-backed resolution condemning the Crimea referendum at a U.N. Security Council emergency vote Saturday but China abstained, isolating Moscow further on the Ukraine crisis.
The draft resolution, which says Sunday's referendum would have no validity, got 13 votes in the 15-member council. But it was rejected when permanent member Russia exercised its veto.
"Russia isolated, alone and wrong blocked the resolution's passage," U.S. ambassador Samantha Power told the Council at its seventh emergency session on Ukraine since the crisis began.
"This is a sad and remarkable moment," she said.
"As we speak, Russian armed forces are massing across Ukraine's eastern border," she added in a short speech.
China often backs Russia at the council, especially on Syria-related votes, and Western diplomats had seen its abstention as the best possible outcome from Saturday's vote.
When the Security Council ruled on a similar international crisis, between Russia and Georgia in 2008, Beijing abstained.
Saturday's emergency meeting was called at Washington's request and the resolution had been drafted by the United States in very measured terms so that it could be accepted by Beijing.
The resolution declared that the referendum on Crimea coming under Kremlin rule has "no validity and cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of Crimea."
Meanwhile, Russia said it was receiving "many requests" to protect people in Ukraine and would consider them.
"Russia is receiving many requests to protect peaceful citizens" in Ukraine, the foreign ministry said in a statement. "These requests will be considered."
"Militants including from Pravy Sektor are continuing to behave in an outrageous manner," it said, referring to the radical Right Sector group whose members were at the forefront of last month's protests that ended in the ouster of pro-Kremlin president Viktor Yanukovych.
"We are getting alarming reports that a column with armed mercenaries from the Right Sector... has left Kharkov for Donetsk and Lugansk," the ministry said, referring to Russian-speaking cities in eastern Ukraine.
If you think about it you will realize Putin is not such a thug at all and he is among the wisest superpower leaders actually.
Indeed if the US is so concerned with democracy maybe they could start by halting their support for terror and exploitation on countries on the other side of the globe from it.
Unless of course the blood of palestinians and Iraqis is any cheaper phenix ?
Poutine is a criminal and a dirty thug. Just look the way he dealt with Chechens or with other people who wanted to be independent. Iraqis and Palestinians have nothing to do with that Chad.
When the US vetoes resolutions condemning israel nobody cares. Now Washington gets a taste of its own medicine. Zionist Scum
Before judge and make naïve comments, please read history books as given.
Crimea, has geopolitical value for those who believe in state. Historically, Europe ( Great Britain ) has been pushing Othman empire for conflict with Russian Empire for presence in Crimea. This days, US replaced the colonial British myth with solid mission to change the East Europe map. With failure! Read great British wars for East and you will understand the conflict.
@phoenix1 your opinion on Putin is a perfect representation of the illusion of culture and knowledge that christian pseudo elites have.
one by one
while no one denies yanukovitch is a thug,
1. There was an international agreement on a peaceful transition, why have your neo nazi Svoboda friends broken their commitment? Aha ...genius
2. Mr Putin, is a conservative, pro market capitalist, all you needed to do is wikipedia, surely not complicated for your intellectual level? Ever heard of Putin's inquisition against oligarchs? Do you know the russian society more than the couple of women you're offered in maameltein?
3. Can you please define the west? because the whole west is standing by Putin now. Putin is more popular in France than the freakin president, hard for you to apprehend?
How much lebanese forces and ex lebanese forces are so blinded by ideology that your analysis of international relations is amateurish, and i'm being polite.